I very much agree with the letter written by member number 179359 regarding the high costs of attaining and revalidating dynamic positioning (DP) certification.
When I qualified for my DP certificate in 1992, after almost five years working as a dynamic positioning operator (DPO), it was valid for life, with no requirement to keep revalidating. In fact, it wasn't a requirement to have a DP certificate at all, and many DPOs of the time did not have one.
The Nautical Institute scheme and the training programme was very good and worked well for around 20 years until revalidation was introduced.
Since then, the goal posts have indeed been moved, several times, with qualified DPOs now having to jump through hoops just to keep their certificates and their jobs.
Are DPOs now any better than they were in the 1990s? I think not. It's all part of the great revalidation rip-off!
Chris Ryan
More letters
Insulin-treated diabetics: help shape your seafaring future
We’re looking for insulin-dependent seafarers working at sea with a valid ENG1 or ML5 certificate to take part in a new study that could mean fewer restrictions on this group in future.
It’s never right to attack civilian seafarers
I was saddened to see the footage of the attack by Ukraine on the two tankers in the Black Sea on 29 November. My heart goes out to the crew and officers who are, in my mind, not combatants in the Russia/Ukraine war.
There's no crisis in the yacht sector
I read Rob Coston's interview with yacht sector recruitment agent Max Lee on your website and found it sensationalist. In my opinion, it incorrectly described the situation regarding safety in yachting as a 'crisis'.