Sharing the story of seafarer sacrifices with the public

Nautilus is committed to promoting the hard work and dedication of our members and to keeping them safe in turbulent times.

Raising awareness of the key role that seafarers and maritime professionals play in our global society is a significant part of what we do at Nautilus. We are committed to promoting the vital work of our members, but more than that, we wholly believe in and appreciate the hard work and dedication that it takes to be a seafarer – and we understand the personal sacrifices many make to keep our lights on and our cupboards stocked.

Maritime professionals are key workers who kept the supply lines open during the turbulent past two years of the coronavirus pandemic. They have also sacrificed their lives for their country in wartime and stand prepared to assist again should they be required. Seafarers deserve recognition for this. Their selfless efforts should never again be 'out of sight and out of mind.'

To help spread the message and to celebrate the vibrancy of this industry, we commissioned a survey of 2,000 UK residents and 1,000 Netherlands residents across August-September 2021. This report, which we are calling the 'Maritime Barometer' serves as a springboard to enhance knowledge about the maritime sector, encourage change within the industry, help to enhance maritime as an attractive career option, and foster a better understanding of the needs of maritime professionals.

Maritime transport is the backbone of global trade and underpins the essence of modern life. We will use the Maritime Barometer to creatively tackle 'sea blindness' and bring our members the recognition they so richly deserve.

After the P&O Ferries scandal, we must take this opportunity to overhaul the working practices of the whole sector
March 17 2022 is a day that will live in infamy in the history of the British maritime industry. 800 loyal, dedicated seafarers were discarded by P&O Ferries without any regard for them, their families and their communities.

A renowned company saw its reputation shattered in the space of a three-minute Zoom call.

P&O Ferries broke the law by not consulting with unions, but sanctions are limited – the company calculated the cost it would have to pay for refusing to consult and for unfair dismissal cases, and factored that into redundancy offers.

It sets a very dangerous precedent and not just here in the UK: if you have deep enough pockets, you can pay your way out of complying with
the law.

This needs to change. The government needs to urgently create the statutory right to an injunction to compel consultation, lift caps on protective awards, and provide for unlimited fines for companies and their directors who ignore the law.

There are glaring gaps in UK employment law, including the immoral practice of fire and rehire. Some 90 seafarers who were dismissed were asked to re-engage with P&O Ferries through a foreign crewing agency.

The government said it will strengthen the code of practice on 'fire and rehire', but it will not prevent companies from buying their way out of a tribunal process. Fire and rehire must be outlawed, no dilutions or equivocations.

The Insolvency Service is pursuing criminal and civil investigations into P&O Ferries, which we support. The government has focused on creating 'minimum wage corridors' with European neighbours, and Nautilus has long called for such measures to support the employment of local seafarers. However, this outrageous action by P&O Ferries goes much further than minimum wage coverage.

Our Fair Ferries Strategy introduces a framework agreement that would require collective bargaining to be concluded with ferry operators on routes to and from UK ports.

These would be set at levels to encourage the employment of local seafarers, and governments must ensure that such agreements are enforceable.

We believe this strategy would create a sustainable future for the ferry industry, stopping operators like P&O Ferries from treating workers as expendable while ensuring a sustainable competitive environment for businesses to flourish.

This would create a true 'level playing field' that encourages a race to the top, rather than a race to the bottom in employment standards. Given the strategic importance of our ferry services to an island nation, it is a goal worth fighting for.

After years of Union campaigning, a visa waiver that allows companies to import low-cost labour to work on UK offshore windfarms appears close to the end.

The UK Home Office has announced an extension of the Offshore Wind Worker's Concession (OWWC) until October 2022. The OWWC, a visa waiver scheme, began in 2017 and has since been renewed four times. It operates as a loophole, allowing employers to import cheap labour to work on offshore windfarms – undercutting wages for UK seafarers.

While any extension of this visa waiver is unfortunate, this is the shortest extension since the OWWC came into force in 2017. We believe this is the strongest sign yet that government is listening and is serious about closing the loophole, something we have campaigned on for years. Nautilus will continue to raise this issue with the Home Office until the visa waiver is finally scrapped but we believe the end is in sight.

I have always maintained that there is no credible evidence of a maritime skills shortage, despite employers arguing removal of the OWWC will mean they struggle to find qualified seafarers.

Offshore wind is a huge opportunity for investment in our maritime workforce, but this cannot happen unless the government is prepared to do everything it can to prevent a race to the bottom. Importing cheaper labour into a domestic market should never be the preference to the incentivisation and encouragement of good quality, local jobs, in local communities.

The expanding windfarm sector is important in support of urgent action on climate change – a wholly necessary transition from fossil fuels to renewables and a realisation that, as the saying goes, there are no jobs on a dead planet. The need for intervention is non-negotiable. Already, newer cleaner fuels and technologies are being deployed. However, a people-centred transition, what we refer to as a just transition, must be met with people-centred action.

The Maritime 2050 strategy in the UK is one example of a plan that recognises the importance of skills and continuous professional development. It also notes how better connectivity at sea can advance education and training, something Nautilus has long championed. However, barriers to seafarer development are financial as well as logistical.

Governments must incentivise businesses to re-train and employ seafarers in new and emerging technologies. Investing in the maritime industry of the future starts by investing in the seafarers of today.

According to a recent study by Oxford Economics assessing the impact of the UK’s Support for Maritime Training (SMarT) funding, for every £1 spent in support of cadet training, £4.80 was returned in tangible economic benefits. Sounds like a no-brainer to me.

The government should increase funding for training and in return see a substantive net return on that investment. Many of the UK's leading competitors, such as the Netherlands, provide support up to 100% of the cost of officer training. This is permitted under EU State Aid guidelines, which the UK government has committed to maintain and even enhance, so what's stopping it?

In return for that level of government support, to make training UK cadets a zero cost to the employer, I would countenance greater flexibility on the core training commitment under tonnage tax – so long as we are training more cadets there is nothing to lose. And as the Maritime Skills Commission has recommended, and is working to deliver, let’s make a step change in the training experience for officer trainees. Let's treat them as a valuable investment, not a commodity to tick a box.

The future must be an inclusive and diverse one. A future with investment in people is always the solution.

Keyworkers delivered during the pandemic, and they deserve our support now, says Nautilus general secretary Mark Dickinson.

When the UK finally got a new prime minister, we were asked by a newspaper what our top priorities were.

Enhancing employment rights including Fair Ferries legislation, ensuring a just transition, more funding for cadets, improving connectivity at sea and diversity in the maritime industry were our suggestions.

I am a realist and acutely aware that Liz Truss has a lot on her plate, what with war in Ukraine, the energy crisis and inflation. However, she has also pledged to outlaw the right to strike within 30 days of taking office. This latter commitment is, of course, in response to the wave of industrial action across the country, which has already seen the law changed to allow for the hiring of agency workers to replace striking workers. The optics on that look confusing at best, set against the government's welcome response to the P&O Ferries sackings.

UK unions are already highly restricted. The 2016 Trade Union Act added yet more burden, and it now looks like Seeking a fair deal for all workers things will get ever tougher for the UK’s six million trade union members.

Unions don't take industrial action simply to make a point – they strike as a last resort, only with member support and with the aim of winning for their members. The members decide what those wins look like: job security, improved wages, maintaining pensions. At the heart of it is the desire for a fair deal.

Juxtapose the UK experience with what happens in the Netherlands – where Nautilus works with, and alongside, the FNV to ensure that a fair deal is secured for all Dutch workers including seafarers and all maritime professionals. The 'polder model' of partnership in the national interest is undoubtedly under pressure, and there is a rail strike ongoing. However, like in many European countries, social dialogue is a fundamental part of Dutch society. The voices of working people are listened to and respected by those in power.

In the UK, social dialogue has been under attack for decades. If a voluntary movement of over six million working people can be so wilfully demonised and ignored by politicians, you really have to wonder in whose interests they seek to govern?

It is not as if business interests are demanding these attacks against trade unions. If they are, and if they do, how will they show their investors that they are committed to environmental,social and governance factors? What about the government's commitment to the UN's Sustainability Goals?

Far better for businesses to sit down, talk, and negotiate in good faith. Invest in your workforce and help them through the cost of living crisis. Listen to your workforce, engage with their union representatives, work together. Find sustainable solutions.

During the pandemic we have all worked together, government, unions, employers. This cooperation was striking in the maritime industry at company, national and international level. The maritime professionals that I represent delivered. Many other key workers did likewise – on the front line, keeping the country moving. They deserve to be listened to now.

It would be a scandalous waste not to capture that spirit of partnership to protect jobs, maintain living standards, to create opportunity for training and career progression, to fight for a just transition and to embrace the environmental and technological changes that are coming. To deliver a fair deal for all workers, not least our maritime professionals.

We can do better – we demand better. Further restrictions on trade unions won’t work. We are growing, we remain relevant and nothing unites the trade union movement more than being attacked.

In memory

It was with deep regret that I received news of the passing of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II on 8 September. As the longest serving British Monarch, the Queen's commitment to public service was an inspiration to us all. As Master of the Merchant Navy and Fishing Fleets, Queen Elizabeth had a lifelong commitment to the welfare of Merchant Navy seafarers and fishers, and I know many of our members have a deep affinity with her sense of duty to country and Commonwealth. We send the Royal family and King Charles III our sincerest condolences.

In labour relations, especially in the complex world of the global shipping industry and its hugely competitive international labour market, we are often told to 'keep our eyes on the prize' and to 'see the big picture' and not worry too much about words. As someone who has spent the best part of 45 years in shipping, engaging in collective bargaining and social dialogue and negotiating texts in international instruments – not least the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) – these are valid observations. Without compromise and a willingness to appreciate the other side's position, little would be achieved. It takes two to tango.

However, words matter. Words are what we use to describe commitments, obligations, rights or even just to agree issues to be discussed in the future. They allow parties to international instruments, memorandums, agreements, etc., whether they are legally binding or not, to judge the commitment of the other party. They prove the intent of each party in a negotiation or a discussion. They give confidence that a relationship is mutually beneficial.

When it comes to seafarers' living and working conditions it matters that employers deliver on their commitment, enshrined in the MLC, to continuous improvement. It matters that they continuously improve the health and safety of the workplaces of our members, of all maritime professionals, and that shipowners and ship managers continuously improve training and expand opportunity so that all seafarers can take part in a just transition to net zero, decarbonisation and human centred technological advancement in the maritime industry.

Shipowners like to remind seafarers that we all supported the development of the MLC because of the need for a level playing field in global shipping. They suggest that, until all countries have ratified the MLC, 'improvements' in the international minimum standards must be on the basis of compelling need.

This view is an abrogation of the commitments given to the Seafarers Group at the International Labour Organization (ILO) during the negotiations for the MLC. The level playing field, as desirable as we all thought it was, could never be supported by the seafarers if the standards of the MLC remained static. The principle of a level playing field was agreed only in return for continuous improvement in the standards enshrined in the MLC and a simplified amendment process is testament to that.

Furthermore, continuous improvement is not predicated on compelling need, it is already a requirement in Title 5 and must be enforced by the competent authority of the ratifying state. Ironically, given the regular and ongoing attacks on trade unionism, it is most readily and easily demonstrated through social dialogue and collective bargaining. You would think that might be something shipowners and ship managers would want to discuss, even to shout about, given how vocal they were and how often they metaphorically clapped for seafarers during the Covid-19 induced crew change crisis.

So yes, words matter. It is high time shipowners and ship managers understood that and engaged in a discussion about how together we deliver continuous improvement. We can sign all the MOUs you like, but for sure we will keep our eyes on the prize and see the big picture. We will never stop reminding the industry of their commitments in international law. If these commitments are just words on a piece of paper then we are in for a difficult time.

In the run-up to Christmas and the end of another year, our members can rest assured that their Union is out there fighting for a better deal, a fair deal, whether that is on labour relations, technology, decarbonisation or future skills.

For members at sea, we know how difficult it is to be away from friends and family at this time of year. But wherever you are this holiday season,stay safe. Wishing you all a very merry Christmas and a happy 2023.